Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
2.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 77: 80-87, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1800043

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic is a traumatic stressor resulting in anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and burnout among healthcare workers. We describe an intervention to support the health workforce and summarize results from its 40-week implementation in a large, tri-state health system during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: We conducted 121 virtual and interactive Stress and Resilience Town Halls attended by 3555 healthcare workers. Town hall participants generated 1627 stressors and resilience strategies that we coded and analyzed using rigorous qualitative methods (Kappa = 0.85). RESULTS: We identify six types of stressors and eight types of resilience strategies reported by healthcare workers, how these changed over time, and how town halls were responsive to emerging health workforce needs. We show that town halls dedicated to groups working together yielded 84% higher mean attendance and more sharing of stressors and resilience strategies than those offered generally across the health system, and that specific stressors and strategies are reported consistently while others vary markedly over time. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual and interactive Stress and Resilience Town Hall is an accessible, scalable, and sustainable intervention to build mutual support, wellness, and resilience among healthcare workers and within hospitals and health systems responding to emerging crises, pandemics, and disasters.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Resilience, Psychological , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Health Workforce , Humans , Pandemics
3.
Neuromodulation ; 24(3): 441-447, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1593901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Due to the impact of COVID-19 epidemic, face-to-face follow-up treatments for patients with chronic pain and implanted spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices are forced to be delayed or stopped. This has led to more follow ups being done remotely. Meanwhile, with the development of 4G/5G networks, smartphones, and novel devices, remote programming has become possible. Here, we investigated the demand and utility of remote follow-ups including remote programming for SCS for patients with chronic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire including questions on demographic characteristics, pain history, postimplantation life quality, standard follow-up experience, remote follow-up, and remote programming experience was sent to patients diagnosed as chronic intractable pain and treated with SCS during January 2019 to January 2020. RESULTS: A total of 64 participants completed the questionnaire. About 70% of participants expressed demands for remote follow-ups due to the inconvenience, high costs, and time consumption of traditional follow-up visits. Nearly 97% of participants have attempted remote follow-ups, and about 81% of participants have further tried remote programming. Approximately, 96% of them recognized the benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The remote programming was in high demand among participants. Most of the participants have tried remote follow-ups or even remote programming. The remote programming appeared to be more efficient, economic and were widely recognized among participants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Chronic Pain/therapy , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Implantable Neurostimulators , Remote Sensing Technology/methods , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods
4.
Psychiatry Res ; 308: 114376, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1586782

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted utilization volumes and patterns for inpatient psychiatry, though reports have noted inconsistencies on small populations. We obtained demographic and diagnostic data from a retrospective cohort of admitted psychiatric patients at a single-site from March-July 2020 and the corresponding months in 2019. Despite controlling for the modest decrease in inpatient admissions, no statistically significant changes in demographics or utilization was found, except for an increase in patients with substance use disorder (p<0.001). These early findings highlight the demand and necessity for inpatient psychiatry services even during the first COVID-19 spike.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychiatry , Academic Medical Centers , Humans , Inpatients , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Psychiatr Pract ; 27(4): 245-253, 2021 07 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1348094

ABSTRACT

Telehealth has been rapidly deployed in the environment of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to help meet critical mental health needs. As systems of care use telehealth during the pandemic and evaluate the future of telehealth services beyond the crisis, a quality and safety framework may be useful in weighing important considerations for using telehealth to provide psychiatric and behavioral health services within special populations. Examining access to care, privacy, diversity, inclusivity, and sustainability of telehealth to meet behavioral and psychiatric care needs in geriatric and disadvantaged youth populations can help highlight key considerations for health care organizations in an increasingly electronic health care landscape.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health Services , Patient Safety , Psychiatry , Quality Improvement , Telemedicine , Adolescent , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Mental Health Services/standards , Mental Health Services/trends , Psychiatry/standards , Psychiatry/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/standards , Telemedicine/trends
7.
Telemed J E Health ; 27(8): 835-842, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1231014

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telehealth to deliver psychiatric services. Continuation of psychiatric services for individuals with high clinical acuity was critical. This study examined attendance to rapidly deployed telehealth services for psychiatrically high-risk individuals receiving intensive outpatient program (IOP), primarily group-based psychotherapy services for adults and adolescents by race/ethnicity, insurance, and clinical treatment program within a large hospital-based outpatient psychiatric setting. Methods: Chi-square tests compared whether attendance rates for telehealth versus in-person IOP services varied by population group, race, insurance, and clinical program, using observational data of adolescent and adult patients treated between October 1, 2019, and July 31, 2020. Results: Appointment attendance increased for telehealth versus in-person services for adolescents (χ2 (df = 1) = 27.49, p < 0.0001) and adults (χ2 (df = 1) = 434.37, p < 0.0001). For adults, increased appointment attendance for telehealth was observed across insurance type (Medicaid: +11.5%; Medicare: +13.79%; Commercial: +6.94%), race/ethnicity (+6.23% to +15.76% across groups), and for IOP groups across all five diagnostic treatment programs (between 7.59% and 15.9% increases across groups). Adolescent results were mixed; increased appointment attendance for telehealth was observed among commercially insured youth (+7.11%), but no differences were observed for Medicaid-insured youth. Non-Hispanic white youth had increased attendance for telehealth (+8.38%) and no differences were observed for non-Hispanic black youth. Decreases were found in telehealth attendance for Hispanic/Latinx youth (-13.49%). Discussion: Rapidly deployed telehealth increased attendance to intensive services for psychiatrically high-risk individuals, particularly among adults and for adolescents with commercial insurance and non-Hispanic white youth. Trends among racial/ethnic and Medicaid-insured youth warrant further investigation regarding the potential for special challenges or vulnerabilities and advocacy needs. Findings highlight telehealth as an important tool in supporting availability of services for individuals with high levels of psychiatric acuity, particularly for group-based services, during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Hospitals , Humans , Medicare , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
8.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 15: 644593, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1194590

ABSTRACT

We estimate that 208,000 deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices have been implanted to address neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders worldwide. DBS Think Tank presenters pooled data and determined that DBS expanded in its scope and has been applied to multiple brain disorders in an effort to modulate neural circuitry. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 providing a space where clinicians, engineers, researchers from industry and academia discuss current and emerging DBS technologies and logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The emphasis is on cutting edge research and collaboration aimed to advance the DBS field. The Eighth Annual DBS Think Tank was held virtually on September 1 and 2, 2020 (Zoom Video Communications) due to restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The meeting focused on advances in: (1) optogenetics as a tool for comprehending neurobiology of diseases and on optogenetically-inspired DBS, (2) cutting edge of emerging DBS technologies, (3) ethical issues affecting DBS research and access to care, (4) neuromodulatory approaches for depression, (5) advancing novel hardware, software and imaging methodologies, (6) use of neurophysiological signals in adaptive neurostimulation, and (7) use of more advanced technologies to improve DBS clinical outcomes. There were 178 attendees who participated in a DBS Think Tank survey, which revealed the expansion of DBS into several indications such as obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder, addiction and Alzheimer's disease. This proceedings summarizes the advances discussed at the Eighth Annual DBS Think Tank.

10.
Psychiatr Q ; 92(3): 1079-1092, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1080822

ABSTRACT

While COVID-19 has had widespread impact on the way behavioral health services are delivered, very little research exists characterizing how providers have perceived these changes. This study used mixed-methods to understand the complex and varied experiences of staff of a psychiatric service line at a large tertiary medical center with high community spread of COVID-19. A brief convenience survey was sent to all staff of the service line and thematic analysis generated brief themes and their frequency. Qualitative focus groups were then held to elucidate greater detail on survey responses. In total, 99 individuals responded to the survey and 17 individuals attended two focus groups in which theoretical saturation was achieved. While brief survey responses generated three broad themes, including operations, telehealth and technology, and communication, focus group data provided nuanced information about these themes, including reasons underlying heightened stress and fatigue felt by staff, inadequacy of technology while finding innovative approaches for its use, and appreciation for the benefits of telehealth while expressing concern for patients not served well by it. These mixed-methods findings highlight the complexities of implementing widespread changes during COVID-19 and demonstrate how survey and focus group data can be used to evaluate rapid care transformations driven by COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19 , Health Care Surveys , Health Personnel/psychology , Mental Health Services , Telemedicine , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers
11.
Psychiatry Res ; 298: 113776, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1062564

ABSTRACT

Inpatient psychiatric facilities can face significant challenges in containing infectious outbreaks during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main objective of this study was to characterize the epidemiology, testing data, and containment protocols of COVID-19 in a large academic medical center during the height of the COVID-19 outbreak. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on hospitalized individuals on five inpatient psychiatric units from March 1st to July 8th, 2020. Demographic data collected include age, race, gender, ethnicity, diagnosis, and admission status (one or multiple admissions). In addition, a Gantt chart was used to assess outbreak data and timelines for one unit. Testing data was collected for patients admitted to inpatient psychiatric units, emergency room visits, and employees. 964 individuals were hospitalized psychiatrically. The study population included ethnically diverse patients with various mental illnesses. We also describe infection prevention strategies, screening, and triage protocols utilized to safely continue patient flow during and beyond the study period with a low patient and employee infection rate. In summary, our study suggests that early implementation of triage, screening, extensive testing, and unit-specific interventions can help prevent and contain the spread of COVID-19 in inpatient psychiatric units and help facilitate safe delivery of care during a pandemic.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Triage , Academic Medical Centers/standards , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/standards , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Triage/standards , Triage/statistics & numerical data
12.
Front Neurosci ; 14: 594696, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-967906

ABSTRACT

As COVID-19 rampages throughout the world and has a major impact on the healthcare system, non-emergency medical procedures have nearly come to a halt due to appropriate resource reallocation. However, pain never stops, particularly for patients with chronic intractable pain and implanted spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices. The isolation required to fight this pandemic makes it impossible for such patients to adjust the parameters or configuration of the device on site. Although telemedicine has shown a great effect in many healthcare scenarios, there have been fewer applications of such technology focusing on the interaction with implanted devices. Here, we introduce the first remote and wireless programming system that enables healthcare providers to perform video-based real-time programming and palliative medicine for pain patients with a SCS implant. During the COVID-19 pandemic from January 23, 2020, the date of lockdown of Wuhan, to April 30, 2020, 34 sessions of remote programming were conducted with 16 patients. Thirteen of the 16 patients required programming for parameter optimization. Improvement was achieved with programming adjustment in 12 of 13 (92.3%) cases. Eleven of the 16 (68.8%) patients reported that the system was user-friendly and met their needs. Five patients complained of an unstable connection resulting from the low network speed initially, and three of these patients solved this problem. In summary, we demonstrated that a remote wireless programming system can deliver safe and effective programming operations of implantable SCS device, thereby providing palliative care of value to the most vulnerable chronic pain patients during a pandemic. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03858790.

13.
Psychiatry Res ; 295: 113629, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-957358

ABSTRACT

The unprecedented impact of COVID-19 has raised concern for the potential of increased suicides due to a convergence of suicide risk factors. We obtained suicide mortality data to assess completed suicides during the period of strict stay-at-home quarantine measures in Connecticut and compared this data with previous years. While the total age-adjusted suicide mortality rate decreased by 13% during the lockdown period compared with the 5-year average, a significantly higher proportion of suicide decedents were from racial minority groups. This finding may provide early evidence of a disproportionate impact from the social and economic challenges of COVID-19 on minority populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/ethnology , Suicide, Completed/ethnology , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cause of Death , Connecticut/ethnology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
15.
Psychiatry Res ; 293: 113425, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-726820

ABSTRACT

Balancing public health physical distancing guidelines and the need to provide critical mental health services for risky and psychiatrically complex patient populations without disruption, many systems swiftly pivoted to telehealth to provide care during COVID-19. Leveraging technology, Yale New Haven Psychiatric Hospital's ambulatory services designed and deployed virtual intensive outpatient (IOP) and outpatient (OP) group-based services rapidly. Strategies for rapid deployment of group-based services, including action steps transitioning to telehealth, clinical protocols, and remote workforce training, early observations and challenges to implementation are described as helpful tools for clinical settings with similar needs to prevent infectious spread while addressing the mental health needs of patients.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , COVID-19/prevention & control , Mental Health Services , Quarantine/psychology , Telemedicine/methods , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Physical Distancing , Quarantine/methods , SARS-CoV-2
17.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 27(9): 1420-1424, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-690364

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has demanded unprecedented actions in the delivery of outpatient psychiatric services, including the rapid shift of services from in-person to telehealth in response to public health physical distancing guidelines. One such shift was to convert group-level intensive outpatient psychiatric (IOP) interventions to telehealth. Historically, telehealth in psychiatric care has been studied in provider-patient interactions, but has not been as well studied for group telehealth service delivery. During the COVID-19 outbreak, providing group-based interventions was important in order to care for high-risk individuals who needed structured psychotherapy group support. However, the delivery of services via telehealth led to special challenges that were unable to be fully accommodated by the preexisting telehealth infrastructure. Rapid feasibility testing and adoption of technology was needed to support IOP services to minimize infectious spread while delivering group services to high-risk psychiatric patients. This article describes the processes and workflows for service delivery and early results of telehealth for IOP services in 2 adolescent treatment programs. In addition, the article highlights early observations around safety and quality and the role of telehealth policy and payment.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Adolescent , COVID-19 , Connecticut , Electronic Health Records , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Quality of Health Care , Telemedicine/methods
20.
Psychiatr Serv ; 71(6): 624-626, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-108871

ABSTRACT

This Open Forum focuses on specific challenges, contingency planning considerations, and downstream impacts of COVID-19 on inpatient psychiatric care. COVID-19 is a novel coronavirus that has been declared a pandemic. Challenges for inpatient psychiatry include risky close contact among staff and patients, space constraints, and structural barriers in care delivery. Nuanced considerations of five contingency planning strategies in response to COVID-19 are described, including COVID-19-specific precautions, visitor restrictions, physician workforce considerations, operational adjustments, and group therapy changes. Organized leadership and clear communication are identified as early priorities in pandemic response to minimize misinformation and address immediate challenges.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Infection Control , Mental Disorders , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Strategic Planning , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Inpatients , Leadership , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/standards , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL